Bitcoin: Which SIGHASH type we have to append at the end of the trimmed transaction in OP_CHECKSIG

Understanding Bitcoin SIGHASH Types and their Applications

Bitcoin, a decentralized cryptocurrency, relies on various cryptographic techniques to ensure secure and transparent transactions. One crucial aspect of these transactions is the use of Sign Hash (SIGHASH) types, which are used for input scripts verification in the context of Bitcoin.

In this article, we will delve into the world of SIGHASH types, their significance in Bitcoin’s transaction validation process, and provide guidance on how to determine which type to append at the end of a trimmed transaction during input scripts verification.

SIGHASH Types

Bitcoin transactions are divided into two categories: Signed and Unsigned. Signed transactions contain signed scripts using Sign Hash (SIGHASH) types, while Unsigned transactions do not include any script signatures.

The primary SIGHASH types used in Bitcoin transactions are:

  • SIGHASH zero

    : This type indicates that the transaction is unsigned.

  • SIGHASH one: This type enables input scripts verification, allowing the miner to validate the contents of the transaction.

  • SIGHASH three: Similar to SIGHASH one, but with a larger block size limit.

Trimmed Transactions and Input Scripts Verification

During input scripts verification, the trimmed transaction is passed through several stages before being validated by the miner:

  • Verification: The trimmed transaction is checked for any errors or invalid data.

  • Input Script Verification: If the trimmed transaction has input scripts, they are verified using SIGHASH types.

When determining which SIGHASH type to append at the end of a trimmed transaction during verification, we must consider the following factors:

  • Transaction Signature: The presence and contents of the transaction signature (also known as the “SIGHASH zero” signature) will indicate if input scripts are enabled.

  • Input Scripts

    Bitcoin: Which SIGHASH type we have to append at the end of the trimmed transaction in OP_CHECKSIG

    : If input scripts are present in the transaction, they will be verified using SIGHASH one. To verify input scripts, a miner must have the corresponding private key for each script.

  • Block Size Limit: The maximum block size limit imposed by the network (currently 2 MB) will determine which SIGHASH type is allowed.

Example: Understanding the Example Transaction

Suppose we’re examining an example transaction:

{

"version": 2,

"txid": "abcdef123",

"vout": [1, 2],

"locktime": 100000,

"confirmations": 10

}

In this case:

  • The version field (2) indicates an unsigned transaction.

  • The txid, vout, and locktime fields are present, which means input scripts are enabled.

  • The confirmations field (10) also confirms that the transaction is valid.

To determine which SIGHASH type to append at the end of this trimmed transaction during verification:

  • Check if the transaction signature is a “SIGHASH zero” signature (i.e., it’s unsigned). In this case, we’re assuming the transaction is indeed unsigned.

  • Verify the presence and contents of input scripts by examining the vout field.

Based on our analysis, since the transaction has input scripts (vout field), we should append SIGHASH one to enable input scripts verification during verification.

Conclusion

In conclusion, determining which SIGHASH type to append at the end of a trimmed transaction during input scripts verification in Bitcoin involves considering various factors, including transaction signature presence and contents, input script verification, and block size limits. By understanding these concepts, you’ll be able to ensure secure and transparent transactions are executed on the Bitcoin network.

Remember to consult official documentation for more detailed information on SIGHASH types, transaction verification processes, and other relevant topics related to Bitcoin.

© 版权声明
THE END
喜欢就支持一下吧
点赞11 分享
评论 抢沙发
头像
欢迎您留下宝贵的见解!
提交
头像

昵称

取消
昵称表情代码图片